Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Motoring

Lawsuits accuse top automakers of faulty air bags, delays

China Daily | Updated: 2018-03-19 11:06
Share
Share - WeChat
A Takata logo is seen on a display of child safety seats at a car showroom on June 26, 2017 in Tokyo, Japan.[Photo by Christopher Jue/Getty Images]

DETROIT-General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, Volkswagen and Mercedes all knew of problems with dangerous exploding Takata air bag inflators years before issuing recalls, according to three class actions filed on Wednesday with the federal court in Miami.

The lawsuits cite company documents obtained through previous legal actions against other automakers over faulty Takata inflators.

The plaintiffs allege that automakers were informed of inflator defects during tests but delayed taking action.

Allegations against GM are among the most serious. Takata documents showed that GM employees expressed concerns about inflators rupturing as early as 2003.

GM on Wednesday called the lawsuit "baseless and without merit" and said it misstates "a host of material facts".

Mercedes-Benz called the allegations unfounded, and Fiat Chrysler declined to comment, saying it had not been served with a copy. Messages were left Wednesday seeking comment from VW.

Takata uses the chemical ammonium nitrate to create small explosions to inflate air bags. But the chemical can deteriorate when exposed to high temperatures and airborne moisture.

That causes it to explode with too much force, blowing apart a metal canister and hurling shrapnel. At least 22 people have died worldwide and more than 180 have been hurt.

The problem touched off the largest series of automotive recalls in US history, with 19 automakers having to recall up to 69 million inflators in 42 million vehicles.

The problem brought a criminal conviction and fine against Takata and forced the Japanese company into bankruptcy protection.

The lawsuits, which consolidate individual claims that were filed previously, allege that owners paid higher prices for their vehicles than they would have if the defect had been disclosed.

They allege that manufacturers picked Takata to supply inflators because the cost was less than other air bag makers who used different, less volatile chemicals as propellants.

"These auto manufacturers were well aware of the public safety risks posed by Takata's airbags long ago, and still waited years to disclose them to the public and take action," Peter Prieto, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement.

In an April 2003 communication with Takata, GM was concerned about "ballistic variability", which is a tendency for the air bags to either underinflate or explode when deployed, the lawsuit against GM said.

In 2004, Takata employees met with GM officials about a tendency for the inflators to shoot flames when they ruptured, and in March of 2006, Takata reported that inflators tested for GM vehicles continued to show "aggressive behavior", including the escape of "molten propellant" when they ruptured.

Yet GM didn't issue any recalls until June 2014 when it recalled 29,000 Chevrolet Cruze compact cars from the 2013 and 2014 model years, according to the lawsuit.

"Defendants did nothing to meaningfully investigate the problem, notify the appropriate regulators or notify the class (car owners)," the lawsuit stated.

GM also received reports of real-world problems in 2011 and 2014, including one case in which a Cruze driver was blinded in one eye by an exploding inflator, according to the lawsuit. GM and Takata blamed the trouble on a manufacturing problem instead of the deteriorating ammonium nitrate.

"Rather than publicize the truth, both Takata and GM blamed the ruptures on a manufacturing problem," the lawsuit alleged.

Volkswagen, the lawsuit alleged, had repeated quality issues with Takata dating to 2003, even rejecting products after an audit. Yet no recalls were issued until 2016, the plaintiffs claimed.

Daimler, maker of Mercedes-Benz vehicles, had concerns about the integrity of Takata inflators in 2003, according to company emails.

In 2004, Mercedes engineers agreed to "forego key performance variables" and allow use of Takata inflators, the lawsuit stated. The company didn't do any recalls until 2016.

Fiat Chrysler didn't issue its first recall until 2014, even though its engineers expressed concerns about Takata inflators during the early 2000s, the lawsuit stated.

Last year Toyota, BMW, Mazda, Subaru, Nissan and Honda settled similar economic loss class actions for millions of dollars.

AP

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品视频久| 中文字幕成人乱码在线电影| 一本一道精品欧美中文字幕| 特级av毛片免费观看| 性刺激久久久久久久久| 人与禽交另类网站视频| 亚洲精品国产国语| 撕开奶罩揉吮奶头高潮av| 免费a级毛片永久免费| 曰批视频免费40分钟试看天天| 日韩免费无砖专区2020狼| 制服丝袜电影在线观看| 2020国语对白露脸| 日本口工全彩漫画| 免费av一区二区三区无码| 风间由美性色一区二区三区| 小小影视日本动漫观看免费| 亚洲国产精品无码成人片久久| 青青草原亚洲视频| 天天摸天天舔天天操| 亚洲va中文字幕无码久久| 老子影院午夜理伦手机不卡| 够够了太深了h1v3| 久久青草91免费观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频 | 日本大乳高潮视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美精品| 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合潮喷| 国产成人精品视频午夜| 一本加勒比HEZYO无码人妻| 日韩一区二区三区不卡视频| 免费一级特黄视频| 英语老师解开裙子坐我腿中间| 国语自产精品视频在线看| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜不卡| 男女下面一进一出视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区久久不卡 | 乱理电影不卡4k4k| 秋霞免费一级毛片| 国产无遮挡又黄又爽在线观看|