Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Motoring

Lawsuits accuse top automakers of faulty air bags, delays

China Daily | Updated: 2018-03-19 11:06
Share
Share - WeChat
A Takata logo is seen on a display of child safety seats at a car showroom on June 26, 2017 in Tokyo, Japan.[Photo by Christopher Jue/Getty Images]

DETROIT-General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, Volkswagen and Mercedes all knew of problems with dangerous exploding Takata air bag inflators years before issuing recalls, according to three class actions filed on Wednesday with the federal court in Miami.

The lawsuits cite company documents obtained through previous legal actions against other automakers over faulty Takata inflators.

The plaintiffs allege that automakers were informed of inflator defects during tests but delayed taking action.

Allegations against GM are among the most serious. Takata documents showed that GM employees expressed concerns about inflators rupturing as early as 2003.

GM on Wednesday called the lawsuit "baseless and without merit" and said it misstates "a host of material facts".

Mercedes-Benz called the allegations unfounded, and Fiat Chrysler declined to comment, saying it had not been served with a copy. Messages were left Wednesday seeking comment from VW.

Takata uses the chemical ammonium nitrate to create small explosions to inflate air bags. But the chemical can deteriorate when exposed to high temperatures and airborne moisture.

That causes it to explode with too much force, blowing apart a metal canister and hurling shrapnel. At least 22 people have died worldwide and more than 180 have been hurt.

The problem touched off the largest series of automotive recalls in US history, with 19 automakers having to recall up to 69 million inflators in 42 million vehicles.

The problem brought a criminal conviction and fine against Takata and forced the Japanese company into bankruptcy protection.

The lawsuits, which consolidate individual claims that were filed previously, allege that owners paid higher prices for their vehicles than they would have if the defect had been disclosed.

They allege that manufacturers picked Takata to supply inflators because the cost was less than other air bag makers who used different, less volatile chemicals as propellants.

"These auto manufacturers were well aware of the public safety risks posed by Takata's airbags long ago, and still waited years to disclose them to the public and take action," Peter Prieto, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement.

In an April 2003 communication with Takata, GM was concerned about "ballistic variability", which is a tendency for the air bags to either underinflate or explode when deployed, the lawsuit against GM said.

In 2004, Takata employees met with GM officials about a tendency for the inflators to shoot flames when they ruptured, and in March of 2006, Takata reported that inflators tested for GM vehicles continued to show "aggressive behavior", including the escape of "molten propellant" when they ruptured.

Yet GM didn't issue any recalls until June 2014 when it recalled 29,000 Chevrolet Cruze compact cars from the 2013 and 2014 model years, according to the lawsuit.

"Defendants did nothing to meaningfully investigate the problem, notify the appropriate regulators or notify the class (car owners)," the lawsuit stated.

GM also received reports of real-world problems in 2011 and 2014, including one case in which a Cruze driver was blinded in one eye by an exploding inflator, according to the lawsuit. GM and Takata blamed the trouble on a manufacturing problem instead of the deteriorating ammonium nitrate.

"Rather than publicize the truth, both Takata and GM blamed the ruptures on a manufacturing problem," the lawsuit alleged.

Volkswagen, the lawsuit alleged, had repeated quality issues with Takata dating to 2003, even rejecting products after an audit. Yet no recalls were issued until 2016, the plaintiffs claimed.

Daimler, maker of Mercedes-Benz vehicles, had concerns about the integrity of Takata inflators in 2003, according to company emails.

In 2004, Mercedes engineers agreed to "forego key performance variables" and allow use of Takata inflators, the lawsuit stated. The company didn't do any recalls until 2016.

Fiat Chrysler didn't issue its first recall until 2014, even though its engineers expressed concerns about Takata inflators during the early 2000s, the lawsuit stated.

Last year Toyota, BMW, Mazda, Subaru, Nissan and Honda settled similar economic loss class actions for millions of dollars.

AP

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 激情无码人妻又粗又大| 久久综合九色综合97伊人麻豆 | 一本大道一卡二大卡三卡免费| 樱花草在线社区www| 人妻丰满熟妇av无码区| 蜜桃av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲综合一区在线观看 | 大尺度视频网站久久久久久久久| 久久中文网中文字幕| 欧美国产日韩久久久| 作者不详不要…用力呢| 色一情一区二区三区四区| 国产护士一级毛片高清| 69视频在线观看高清免费| 妞干网在线免费观看| 久久久久国产综合AV天堂| 欧欧美18videosex性哦欧美美| 亚洲第一黄色网| 竹菊影视国产精品| 四虎永久精品免费观看| 麻豆AV一区二区三区久久| 国产精品多人p群无码| 99热综合在线| 小兔子救了蛇被蛇两根进去| 久久99精品久久久久久水蜜桃| 最近2019mv中文字幕免费看| 亚洲日本天堂在线| 狂野欧美性猛交xxxx巴西| 又嫩又硬又黄又爽的视频| 里番acg全彩| 国产欧美日韩另类一区乌克兰| 97久久精品无码一区二区| 女人与公拘交酡全过程i| 中文人妻熟妇乱又伦精品| 日本在线观看成人小视频| 亚1州区2区三区4区产品| 欧美成人精品第一区二区三区 | 呦交小u女国产秘密入口| 在线观看日本www| xyx性爽欧美| 成人免费观看视频高清视频|