Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

Questions remain after Boeing crashes

By SCOTT REEVES/ZHU WENQIAN | China Daily | Updated: 2019-03-22 07:38
Share
Share - WeChat
Chinese family and friends mourn victims of the Ethiopian Airlines Flight ET 302 plane crash during a commemoration ceremony at the scene of the crash, near the town of Bishoftu, southeast of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, March 13, 2019. [Photo/Agencies]

Bad data suggestion

Pilots said they first learned of potential difficulties with the new system after the Lion Air crash. The FAA then ordered manuals for the 737 MAX to be updated and Boeing issued instructions telling pilots how to override the system. But pilots, who said Boeing was slow to issue the instructions, independently compiled a 13-page guide for the aircraft.

However, there also may be a problem with the software that drives the anti-stall device. Boeing is developing an upgrade. The new software for the aircraft will enable the stall-prevention system to use multiple data feeds rather than relying on the single feed used when the plane was delivered in 2017.

The software and hardware updates follow preliminary results from the Lion Air crash that suggested bad data from a single sensor may have caused the anti-stall system to malfunction.

Boeing said it worked on the new software before the Ethiopian Airlines crash. The company said the software update, expected to be installed by the end of this month, will make an "already safe plane safer."

In the US, the FAA certified the 737 MAX safe, and this raised questions about the relationship between federal regulators and Boeing.

James Hall, former chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, said the US aircraft industry is moving toward using its own employees to certify aircraft safety, a departure from previous practices at the FAA. The safety board investigates the cause of air, rail and marine accidents, while the FAA operates the US air traffic control system and certifies planes safe to fly.

Hall expressed his views in an article in The New York Times one day after the FAA grounded Boeing's MAX 8 and MAX 9 aircraft.

"Rather than naming and super-vising its own 'designated air-worthiness representative,' the (FAA) decided to allow Boeing and other manufacturers who qualified under revised procedures to select their own employees to certify the safety of their aircraft," he wrote.

Hall said pilots were not trained on flight simulators in the use of the anti-stall device. "The simulator is the fundamental tool for training pilots," Hall, now an aviation consultant in Washington, told China Daily.

Dennis Tajer, spokesman for the pilots union at American Airlines, told the news website Quartz that training for the use of the 737 MAX's anti-stall system was limited to "an iPad lesson for an hour."

Some analysts say that much of the technology in contemporary aircraft has outstripped the ability of federal regulators to keep up with advances.

They note that the FAA's practice of relying on industry insiders is no different from the US Food and Drug Administration's reliance on experts from the companies it regulates, state bar associations overseeing the conduct of attorneys and taking disciplinary action when needed, or local police investigating a shooting involving an officer.

Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, the captain of an Airbus A320 on US Airways Flight 1549, landed the aircraft in the Hudson River just west of Manhattan in 2009 after the engines failed, saving the lives of all on board. He wrote in an article published by Dow Jones Market-Watch: "For too many years, the FAA has not been provided budgets sufficient to ensure appropriate oversight of a rapidly growing global aviation industry.

"Staffing has not been adequate for FAA employees to oversee much of the critically important work of validating and approving aircraft certification."

Critics said the FAA's chronic understaffing and its "cozy relationship" with manufacturers resulted in the grounding of Boeing's widebody 787 Dreamliner.

In January 2013, a lithium-ion battery sparked a fire on a Japanese Airlines Dreamliner parked at Logan International Airport in Boston. There were no injuries.

The NTSB blamed the fire, in part, on "insufficient guidance for FAA engineers to use during the certification process to ensure compliance with applicable requirements". The problem was solved by placing such batteries in a vented stainless steel box, but had the fire occurred when the plane was in the air, it could have crashed.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 丁香婷婷六月天| 亚洲狠狠色丁香婷婷综合| 夜夜爽免费视频| 成人精品一区二区久久 | 99久久人妻精品免费一区| 日本公与熄乱理在线播放370| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区| 经典国产一级毛片| 国产欧美精品一区二区三区-老狼 国产欧美精品一区二区三区-老狼 | 国产真人无码作爱免费视频| 一个人看www免费高清字幕| 日本高清免费一本视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩国产成人| 精品国产福利在线观看| 国产小视频福利| 78成人精品电影在线播放| 性欧美乱妇高清COME| 久久精品国产亚洲AV香蕉| 欧美激情第1页| 免费看美女吃男生私人部位| 韩国r级春天在线无删减| 国产精品后入内射日本在线观看 | 久9热免费精品视频在线观看| 欧美三级香港三级日本三级| 人妻少妇精品中文字幕AV蜜桃| 英国video性精品高清最新| 国产污片在线观看| 91精品视频网| 女人十八黄毛片| 中文字幕日韩精品无码内射| 日韩欧美中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久| avidolzhd| 日产精品一卡2卡三卡4乱码久久| 亚洲一区二区精品视频| 毛片视频网站在线观看| 全黄大全大色全免费大片| 老阿姨哔哩哔哩b站肉片茄子芒果| 国产成人精品日本亚洲专区6| 69网站在线观看| 天堂在线www|