Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / China-US

CEO: FedEx cannot be US govt's policeman

By Heng Weili in New York and Liu Zhihua in Beijing | China Daily | Updated: 2019-06-26 23:32
Share
Share - WeChat
A FedEx delivery worker carries a package for a delivery in Wilmette, Illinois, Oct 27, 2015. [Photo/Agencies]

As FedEx Corp faces pressure after mishandling packages involving China's Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, the US company has sued the US government, claiming that it is "a transportation company, not a law enforcement agency."

FedEx filed a suit on Monday in US District Court in Washington DC, seeking to enjoin the US Department of Commerce from enforcing prohibitions contained in the Export Administration Regulations, also known as the EAR.

Frederick W. Smith, the company's CEO and chairman, told Fox News that FedEx cannot be the US government's policeman for export and import controls.

"Huawei is just emblematic of the problem," Smith said.

"The Huawei incident concerns two packages, two out of 15 million ... That is exactly the kind of confusing situation when any tiny number of packages becomes an international cause celebre, because of these regulations that make FedEX and other common carriers responsible for government regulations to prohibit exports and imports, to certify that the shipper who may or may not be telling the truth is in compliance with those exports regulations.

"Despite the fact that we have 15 million shipments a day, and if we make an error on any one of them, without a trial, without any due process, we can be fined $250,000 for a piece."

He said the company doesn't think these regulations are based on law.

"FedEx believes that the EAR violate common carriers' rights to due process under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution as they unreasonably hold common carriers strictly liable for shipments that may violate the EAR without requiring evidence that the carriers had knowledge of any violations," FedEx said in a statement.

"This puts an impossible burden on a common carrier such as FedEx to know the origin and technological makeup of the contents of all the shipments it handles and whether they comply with the EAR."

Last month, FedEx rerouted four packages bound for Huawei's headquarters in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, to the United States, claiming "inadvertent misrouting."

The incident led to a regulatory investigation by the Chinese government "on suspicion of undermining the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese clients."

Over the weekend, FedEx returned a New York-bound package containing a Huawei smartphone, a P30 Pro, to the sender at PCMag's office in London.

According to Fortune.com, FedEx returned the phone with a note saying the shipment was voided due to a "US government issue with Huawei and the Chinese government."

FedEx's filing on Monday said that the US Department of Commerce restrictions "essentially deputize Fed-Ex to police the content of the millions of packages it ships daily even though doing so is a virtually impossible task, logistically, economically, and in many cases, legally."

On May 16, the US Department of Commerce placed Huawei and 68 affiliates on an "Entity List" that restricts companies from providing Huawei and its affiliates with technology originating in the US without government approval. On May 20, however, the US Department of Commerce said there would be a 90-day grace period before the Huawei restrictions went into effect.

The lawsuit did not mention the Huawei incidents specifically.

"1,100 entities are now on the list (of the US Department of Commerce), with five more just added on Friday. It is impossible even with the fantastic computer systems and compliance investigation we made that we simply cannot be the policeman for the US Department of Commerce," Smith said.

A spokesman for the US Department of Commerce told The Wall Street Journal that it had yet to review FedEx's complaint.

FedEx's main rival, United Parcel Service Inc, said on Tuesday it would not be a party to the lawsuit.

The US has accused Huawei of violating sanctions against Iran, a country with which it is currently involved in an escalating political dispute.

Huawei has said that the US sanctions could cost it billions of dollars in revenue. Numerous US semiconductor companies also stand to lose substantial business with Huawei due to the restrictions.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人综合在线视频| 最近中文字幕免费高清mv| 国产交换丝雨巅峰| 91久久精品国产91久久性色也 | 国产又爽又黄又无遮挡的激情视频| a毛看片免费观看视频| 老阿姨哔哩哔哩b站肉片茄子芒果 老阿姨哔哩哔哩b站肉片茄子芒果 | 亚洲天堂电影在线观看| 被女同桌调教成鞋袜奴脚奴| 天堂在线www| 久久久久久久综合综合狠狠| 深夜福利一区二区| 国产乱码免费卡1卡二卡3卡四| 91xav在线| 我与白丝同桌的故事h文| 亚洲国产精品毛片AV不卡在线| 真人无码作爱免费视频| 国产h视频在线观看| 99热精品久久| 性xxxxx护士第一次| 久久国产乱子伦精品在| 欧美一级高清免费播放| 亚洲精品欧美精品日韩精品| 久久6这里只有精品| 精品人妻久久久久久888| 国产在线步兵一区二区三区| 69农夫和老妇重口小说| 尤物网在线视频| 久久婷婷人人澡人人爽人人爱| 欧美黑人乱大交ⅹxxxxx| 加勒比色综合久久久久久久久| chinese乱子伦xxxx视频播放| 无遮无挡非常色的视频免费| 亚洲aⅴ男人的天堂在线观看 | 国产精品99久久久久久人| JAPANESE在线播放国产| 成av免费大片黄在线观看| 久久香蕉精品视频| 狠狠躁夜夜躁无码中文字幕| 嘟嘟嘟www在线观看免费高清| а√最新版地址在线天堂|