Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / China US trade tensions

A strong case for calm talks to resolve trade row

By Bala Ramasamy and Mathew Yeung | China Daily | Updated: 2019-10-14 09:45
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo by Ma Xuejing/China Daily]

The ongoing US-China trade dispute should not have arisen in the first place, if trade imbalance is the core issue. Consider this: only China has the capacity to satisfy America's huge appetite and demand for products.

Even in an ideal scenario, the rest of the world does not come close to China's production capacity. So, ultimately, the US will have no option but to resume buying from China, at least in the short to medium term.

To be sure, the combined demand of the rest of world won't equal American demand for some goods. Our research findings suggest it would be wise to temper tensions and rhetoric with a dose of reality.

It is not a practical approach on the part of the US to ask American companies to move out of China and find alternative locations or return home. Heightening the sense of uncertainty would not help consumers and companies involved in bilateral trade.

In 2018, China exported about $478.4 billion worth of goods to the US, which represents about 3.7 percent of its total output measured by nominal GDP. This amount is responsible for millions of jobs in China.

Although a significant portion of exports to the US is imported (parts and components from other Asian countries) and therefore not made in China, it must be noted that a large amount of Chinese goods heading to the US go through Hong Kong SAR and are counted as Hong Kong exports instead of from the Chinese mainland.

Tariffs are designed to reduce the imports from a partner country, not to eliminate them completely. An increase in prices due to tariff hikes forces retailers and consumers to look for alternatives-goods from other countries, or from domestic sources, if available.

Termed import elasticity of demand, some economists have measured this to be about-1.55 for the US in the long run. That would imply that an increase in the price of imports by 30 percent due to US tariffs would decrease imports from China by about 46.5 percent or about $220 billion.

Even if it is possible to find another country to source imports from, is there any country that could replace China's capacity in its entirety?

Consider the US' largest import item from China: mobile phones. In 2017 and 2018, mobile phones alone accounted for about 13 percent of total imports to the US from China, or about $70 billion a year. In 2017, China exported about $168 billion worth of mobile phones to the world.

The much-touted country to replace China-Vietnam-exported about $30 billion worth of phones while the US exported about $32 billion of the same product category. It implies that even if Vietnam diverts all its exports of mobile phones to the US and the US withdraws all its exports to serve the local American market, it would still be incapable of replacing China's production capacity in its entirety.

Consider yet another item that the US imports from China: footwear. In 2017, the US imported about $14.3 billion worth of footwear from China (roughly 2.7 percent of total imports to the US from China), or about 1.6 billion pairs of shoes. Only if Vietnam, India, Indonesia, Brazil and Turkey were to divert all their exports of shoes from the rest of the world to the US, could China be replaced as a source of imports.

These examples show that replacing China as an import source is just not feasible, at least in the short to medium term. As a result, Chinese producers can rest assured that they have several years to re-configure their exports so that the impact of tariffs on their businesses can be managed.

To what extent could other countries replace the US as an export destination for Chinese goods? Based on 2018 import data, it would require about nine countries, roughly equal to the Netherlands, the UK, Germany, India, Sweden and France to replace all their imports of mobile phones from the rest of the world with imports from China just to replace the US.

By way of comparison, if Germany and the UK chose to import all their shoes from China instead of the rest of the world, this would be sufficient to replace China's entire export of shoes to the US.

1 2 Next   >>|
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 在线一区免费播放| 暴力调教一区二区三区| 国产xxxx做受视频| 18禁网站免费无遮挡无码中文| 思思99re热| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁2014| 污污视频在线免费看| 哦好大好涨拨出来bl| 国产香蕉在线精彩视频| 在线天堂bt种子资源| 两个人看的www免费视频中文| 日韩精品中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲欧美综合国产精品一区| 精品国产成a人在线观看| 国产在线精品一区二区夜色| 3d动漫精品啪啪一区二区免费| 好男人好资源在线| 久久99热国产这有精品| 最近中文字幕高清中文字幕无| 亚洲第一视频网站| 精品三级久久久久电影网1| 国产乱视频在线观看| 亚洲网站www| 国内精品久久久久久无码不卡| 一本大道香蕉最新在线视频| 日本免费人成视频播放| 亚洲一区二区三区免费观看| 波多野结衣一道本| 午夜国产在线视频| 调教女m视频免费区| 国产欧美日韩精品专区| 777成影片免费观看| 夫妇交换俱乐部微信群| 中国娇小与黑人巨大交| 日本媚薬痉挛在线观看免费| 亚洲av午夜成人片| 欧美成人在线视频| 亚洲精品高清国产麻豆专区| 精品久久久久久亚洲综合网 | 国产精品福利久久香蕉中文| www.日日爱|