Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Departure from past practices

By ZHANG LIN | China Daily | Updated: 2020-07-14 07:33
Share
Share - WeChat
JIN DING/CHINA DAILY

International tax principles need updating to accommodate the digitalization of the economy

The Office of the United States Trade Representative announced on June 2 that it had initiated an investigation under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 into Digital Services Taxes (DSTs) that have been adopted or are under consideration by many of the country's closest trading partners-Austria, Brazil, the Czech Republic, the European Union, India, Indonesia, Italy, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom.

This provision gives the USTR broad authority to investigate and respond to a foreign country's action which it considers may be unfair or discriminatory and negatively affect US companies.

DSTs could be the trigger for a trade war between the US and Europe or even world widespread.

The issues highlight the conflicts between countries over "digital sovereignty "and pose a huge challenge to the shaping of new tax rules for the digital economy.

For US multinational digital service companies faced with additional tax burdens, building a "neutral, stable, and transparent" international tax rule would be beneficial. However, the federal government seems to have a different view, and its unilateralist approach has weakened the authority and reduced the effectiveness of international organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the World Trade Organization.

The US is adopting a double standard on the issue. It is taking advantage of international laws as a measurement of the legitimacy of DSTs, but it is not willing to resolve the dispute via the WTO, neither is it relying on the OECD for further interpretation and coordination of the rules. Instead, it is adhering to the idea that its domestic law is superior to international law, and threatens to impose high tariffs for "violators".

But the US' withdrawal from negotiations cannot stop the spread of DSTs worldwide, and countries with continued tax base erosion have firmly actively adopted them and endorsed a global tax framework for digital services. Also, the introduction of DSTs in many countries highlights the urgency of establishing new international tax rules in the era of the digital economy.

As of June 2020, 14 EU member states have begun to implement, or expressed support for DSTs. Southeast Asian countries such as Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand are considering levying value-added tax on foreign network service providers, a policy that has produced a huge demonstration effect among countries such as Australia, Canada, Japan, and New Zealand.

The US' withdrawal from negotiations makes it more difficult to achieve global settlement measures under the multilateral framework. As a consequence, more and more countries are likely to take unilateral DSTs as a short-term measure to protect domestic targeted small-and medium-sized enterprises, retain the potential value of domestic users, and change the status quo of tax base erosion.

Punitive measures of high tariffs are not helpful to coordinate the different proposals for international tax reform and overcome the theoretical and technical difficulties.

The Section 301 investigation requires that if DSTs are damaging to US companies, then the US president has the right to increase tariffs; stop trade reciprocity, bilateral trade agreements, bilateral investment agreements, or tax treaties; impose import limits; or take punitive measures like levying other expenses.

Last December, the US threatened to impose up to 100 percent import tariffs on $2.4 billion French exported commodities including wines, handbags, cosmetics and cheese. It is such a "mismatch" to take "traditional" tariff measures in response to "updated" international tax rules with much higher standards.

Instead of threatening to withdraw at this stage, the international community should make joint efforts to speed up multilateral negotiations to solve the theoretical and technical difficulties in the OECD, with a view to achieving a reasonable distribution of the international tax base.

The tough stance and punitive measures of the US will, to a certain extent, delay the implementation of the DSTs, but its political games will also increase the risk of trade conflicts.

On the one hand, the DSTs will create huge financial revenues for the levying countries. According to estimates by the UK Treasury, it is expected that the DSTs will increase the UK's fiscal revenue by 275 million euros ($311 million) in fiscal year 2020-21, and will generate 440 million euros in 2023-24. France is also expected to increase fiscal revenue by 560 million euros per year. Even if the US retaliates with high tariffs,

On the other hand, trade policies could be a political bargaining chip in the negotiations. The US' arbitrary behaviors could force European countries to take countermeasures, such as speeding up investigations of unfair competition in online platforms and digital advertisements, and establishing new antitrust rules in digital platforms. All those things could bring increasing risks to the global economy.

For China, it would be best to not simply support or deny DSTs, as any unilateral measures are not conducive to the coordination of new international tax rules. Due to the challenges posed by the digital economy worldwide, we should adhere to the principle of fairness, neutrality, transparency and stability in shaping international tax rules, as well as support the rise of a global multilateral tax governance system.

China should take an objective and forward-looking perspective on the digital economy. It should not only strengthen international cooperation with the OECD, but promote cooperation with United Nations Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters to ensure that developing countries can participate in international discussions on taxation policies for the digital economy.

The author is a fellow researcher of the Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 十六一下岁女子毛片免费| 夭天曰天天躁天天摸在线观看| 亚洲精品99久久久久中文字幕 | 99久久精品费精品国产| 日本精品视频一区二区三区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久蜜芽| 综合网日日天干夜夜久久| 国产无遮挡吃胸膜奶免费看 | 女老丝袜脚摩擦阳茎视频 | 精品国产一二三区在线影院 | 中文字幕av无码专区第一页| 曰韩无码无遮挡A级毛片| 亚洲精品国产高清在线观看| 综合网小说图片区| 国产免费黄色片| 1000部拍拍拍18勿入免费凤凰福利 | 成人午夜视频在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲AV麻豆不卡 | 噼里啪啦国语在线播放| 黑人巨茎大战俄罗斯美女| 国产精品高清m3u8在线播放| videos欧美成人| 无码天堂va亚洲va在线va| 五月婷婷丁香在线| 欧美日韩国产亚洲人成| 先锋影音av资源网| 美女跪下吃j8羞羞漫画| 国产剧情一区二区三区| 色偷偷女男人的天堂亚洲网| 国色天香中文字幕视频| √天堂中文在线最新版8下载 | 亚洲国产成人99精品激情在线| 爽爽影院在线看| 免费看黄的网站在线看| 老师你的兔子好软水好多的车视频 | 男女边吃奶边做边爱视频| 熟女性饥渴一区二区三区| 日韩人妻一区二区三区免费| 手机在线观看你懂的| 奇米影视7777狠狠狠狠色| 国产精品免费视频一区|