Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Lifestyle
Home / Lifestyle / Z Weekly

Dining ratings: trust or trouble?

By Gui Qian | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2024-02-21 07:06
Share
Share - WeChat
The hot pot restaurant of Zhao Yige is decorated with a youthful aesthetic, incorporating trendy colors and slang slogans. CHINA DAILY

Debates arise over restaurant ratings' reliability as patrons turn to lower-rated spots, disrupting conventional dining norms and posing dilemmas for restaurant owners, Gui Qian reports.

It is a common practice to check review sites before settling on a new restaurant for a meal. But can we always trust these ratings? And does a higher score always mean better quality?

After renowned food connoisseur Chen Xiaoqing suggested checking out eateries with ratings between 3.5 and 4 points (out of 5) in an interview, a recent debate has ignited across Chinese social media. This sparked discussions on whether these slightly lower-rated spots might offer even better dining experiences.

More and more patrons, disappointed by the quality of numerous highly-rated restaurants, are now gravitating toward more modest eateries in hopes of uncovering unexpectedly delightful dishes.

Hashtags such as "Youth flocking to 3.5-point restaurants in a 'revenge culinary' trend" and "The best flavors might be hiding in less acclaimed dining spots" are buzzing on Sina Weibo, and accumulating millions of views.

Amy Wang (pseudonym), hailing from Qingdao, Shandong province, has a knack for discovering these "hidden gems" and she shares her insights on rating apps.

As a part-time food blogger, Wang has visited over 200 restaurants in just six months and even received the "Magical Comment Award "from Dianping, a major Chinese online platform for local services and reviews.

According to Wang, the trend of favoring lower-rated restaurants reflects a growing distrust in the rating system, especially among young diners. Ultra-high scores are not always reliable, as they can be artificially inflated through various means.

For example, some restaurants might offer incentives like complimentary dishes or discounts for positive reviews, and others might train staff to leave reviews on behalf of customers, or even pay for professional services to raise their scores.

"Even labels like 'locals' favorite' might be obtained through deceit — some places hire internet ghostwriters using local IP addresses," Wang explained.

Given these issues, food enthusiasts have realized that solely relying on ratings isn't the most dependable way to choose restaurants of better quality.

"The years a restaurant has been operating also matter, since most dining places struggle to survive beyond six months," Wang said. "An older establishment must be doing something right to thrive in such a competitive industry."

Reading through comments, especially the negative ones, can also be enlightening, according to Wang. "It helps you figure out if the criticism is about service, ambiance, or food quality, and whether you can overlook it. But you should also be wary of overly detailed comments with lots of words and pictures because they are often insincere," she said.

Sometimes, 5-star restaurants can be overrated, but that doesn't mean that poorly-rated ones always offer a stellar culinary experience.

As Wang pointed out, circumstances vary greatly in different places. In major cities like Beijing and Shanghai, where nearly every aspect of life is tied to the internet's rating system, ratings can be reliable. Surprises are more likely in less-developed areas, where online ratings aren't as meticulously managed, and customers aren't as keen on sharing their experiences on social media.

Wang's most memorable experience at a "3.5-point restaurant" happened in a small town in Hanzhong, Shaanxi province. "I visited a place with only two reviews on Dianping, and to my surprise, I had the best remipi (rice slices) of my life," she recalled. "It shows that there are some undiscovered culinary delights yet to be acknowledged by the rating system."

Having worked in Beijing for over seven years, Wang still considers herself a beipiao, or "Beijing drifter".She focuses on exploring modest eateries suitable for solo diners on a budget, dubbing her food blog account "Dagongren Meishi Tujian", or Illustrated Handbook of Food for Laborers.

Like most ordinary workers, especially young people, Wang doesn't have many opportunities for fine dining, but she enjoys grassroots foods like fried chicken, beef noodles, and malatang, a spicy Sichuan broth with meat and vegetables. "Eateries selling these foods typically receive lower ratings compared to high-end restaurants. But I believe that authentic culinary delights are abundant in everyday life," she said.

1 2 Next   >>|
Most Popular
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国模冰冰双人炮gogo| 日韩在线一区二区三区免费视频 | 精品国产亚洲第一区二区三区 | 4399理论片午午伦夜理片| 成人影片一区免费观看| 亚洲Av鲁丝一区二区三区| 特级无码毛片免费视频尤物| 国产一区二区在线视频播放| 69堂在线观看| 在免费jizzjizz在线播| 中文亚洲av片不卡在线观看| 最新仑乱免费视频| 亚洲精品人成在线观看| 精品日产卡一卡乱码| 激情综合色综合啪啪开心| 国产女人好紧好爽| 亚洲日韩在线中文字幕综合| 美女和男生一起差差差| 国产日韩欧美三级| 97精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 成人区人妻精品一区二区不卡视频| 久激情内射婷内射蜜桃| 欧美日韩精品一区二区在线播放| 再深点灬舒服了灬太大了在线观看| 饥渴艳妇小说官途欲妇| 国产精品亚洲欧美大片在线看 | 全免费A级毛片免费看网站| 视频在线观看一区| 国产狂喷潮在线观看在线观看 | 合租屋第三部小雯怀孕第28章| 国产香蕉精品视频| 国内一级野外a一级毛片| √天堂资源地址在线官网| 探花国产精品三级在线播放| 久久精品无码中文字幕| 欧美大片AAAAA免费观看| 亚洲精品NV久久久久久久久久| 男男车车的车车网站免费| 啊用力太猛了啊好深视频免费 | 韩国色三级伦不卡高清在线观看| 国产精品多p对白交换绿帽|