Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / World Watch

EU at crossroads: Pawn of US or China partner?

By Julia Roknifard | China Daily Global | Updated: 2025-05-30 09:05
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/Agencies]

As a multipolar world order continues to solidify, the European Union must realistically assess its current long-standing strategic alliances. It must consider a more pragmatic path if it is to survive as a grouping and emerge as an independent pole that will be able to act in its own interests instead of being shackled to foreign influences that have proven detrimental to its economic, political and cultural sustainability.

While the EU's long-standing transatlantic alliance with the United States has historically provided security and ideological cohesion, the evolving global landscape demands a recalibration as new groupings such as BRICS gain traction and other legacy groupings such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the Gulf Cooperation Council become increasingly influential and move out of the US orbit.

The EU has the potential to be a viable pole in a multipolar world, but this viability depends on several key decisions that the grouping must make to truly unleash its potential.

First, the increasingly fraught transatlantic alliance.

The US-EU relationship, while historically strong, has been showing increasing signs of strain. Whether it's trade disputes, differing approaches to climate policy or conflicting strategies on global diplomacy, Europe often finds itself compelled to align with US interests even when they run counter to its own.

The Ukraine conflict has most starkly highlighted this divergence.

Europe's economic interests — especially energy security and its historically nuanced relationship with Russia — have been sacrificed at the altar of US geopolitical objectives and profiteering.

Sanctions, intended to punish Russia, have boomeranged, leading to inflation, supply shocks and industrial disruption across Europe. Meanwhile, US energy exporters and defense contractors have profited, revealing an asymmetry in how the costs and benefits of this alliance are distributed.

On top of the economic and political shocks in the wake of the Ukraine conflict, attempts by the White House to grab Greenland bring the risks of continued strategic dependency on the US. Such moves are perceived in Europe as unilateral and dismissive of allied consultation, fueling concerns over US disregard for European interests in the Arctic region.

This not only exacerbates existing tensions within the NATO but also contributes to growing European unease about US strategic overreach, potentially accelerating the EU's pursuit of greater geopolitical autonomy. How can the EU sustain a critical position against Russia's actions in Ukraine while bowing to US demands over the sovereign territory of an EU member state?

Second, strategic diversification and alternative alliances.

China, as a rising major power and the EU's key economic partner, offers opportunities for trade diversification, technological collaboration and a more balanced global order — one less constrained by US unilateralism and its often confrontational foreign policy. By engaging more deeply with China, the EU can assert its strategic independence, preserve multilateralism and shape a more equitable international system in which European interests are not subordinated to US priorities.

China offers the EU an opportunity to rebalance its foreign policy and diversify its economic partnerships. As the world's second-largest economy, China is a crucial market for European goods, services and investment. Strengthening economic ties with China can help the EU cushion itself from overdependence on the US and build a more multipolar approach to international relations.

Furthermore, a constructive relationship with China can serve as a gateway to the broader BRICS coalition, allowing the EU to engage with alternative financial institutions like the New Development Bank and explore new trade routes and supply chains. It would also position Europe as a mediator and bridge between Western powers and the Global South, enhancing its diplomatic capital.

Third, keeping principles while seeking common ground.

Seeking closer relations with China does not imply blind alignment or abandonment of core values. At the same time, many in the EU would have noted how the US leans on the grouping and exerts de facto control over its foreign and trade policies — US enemies must be EU enemies as well. We have not seen any such coercion from China against the EU. Instead, the EU must approach its relationship with China with realism and strategic clarity.

The EU and China differ regarding human rights, intellectual property protection and fair trade, and their differences should remain on the table. However, these concerns should be addressed through engagement and consultation, not isolation, and trade and economic interconnectivity must take precedence over "social justice" causes.

The EU can take inspiration from countries that have maintained productive ties with both the West and China such as the ASEAN grouping, leveraging partnerships where interests align while safeguarding national and regional priorities. Strategic autonomy means the ability to make independent decisions, not substituting one dependency for another. Drawing lines over cultural differences, including those of political culture, must not end in drawing an iron curtain between the EU and China or for other poles for that matter.

A golden future or bleak isolation awaits the Europeans.

The EU has a unique opportunity to redefine its global role. By building economic sovereignty, reinvesting in industrial capabilities and recalibrating its foreign partnerships — particularly through deeper engagement with China — the EU can secure a more balanced and resilient future.

Moving beyond the constraints of its current relationship with the US is not a retreat but a strategic evolution toward greater independence, influence and stability on the world stage. Ultimately, aligning more closely with China while reinforcing internal strength will allow the EU to emerge as a true sovereign actor in the 21st century's complex geopolitical landscape.

The author is a senior lecturer at the School of Law and Governance at Taylor's University, Malaysia.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美国产日本高清不卡| 都市春色校园另类| 尤物视频网站在线| 久久精品这里有| 污网站在线观看免费| 国产三级a三级三级| 777米奇影视盒| 巨大挺进她的花茎| 久久精品人人做人人爽电影| 污小说总裁整夜没拔出| 四虎影视永久在线精品免费| 五月天久久婷婷| 在线观看亚洲专区| 中文国产欧美在线观看| 最新国产精品好看的国产精品| 亚洲综合小说久久另类区| 老子影院午夜伦不卡亚洲| 国产日韩精品欧美一区| 97色精品视频在线观看| 性欧美黑人巨大| 久久国产劲暴∨内射| 欧美国产日本高清不卡| 亚洲视频在线观看一区| 美女被按在的视频网站观看| 国产成人一区二区在线不卡| 68日本xxxⅹxxxxx18| 好吊操视频在这星| 久久99国产精品久久99小说 | 中文字幕久久久久久久系列| 最新国产乱人伦偷精品免费网站| 亚洲欧美日韩综合一区| 篠田优在线一区中文字幕| 国产一卡2卡3卡4卡公司在线| 久草视频在线网| 国产精品日本一区二区在线播放 | 国产99在线播放| 鸡鸡插屁股视频| 国产男女免费完整视频| 7777精品久久久大香线蕉| 天堂www网最新版资源官网 | 狠狠色婷婷久久一区二区三区 |