Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Views

Convergence and divergence

A staggered division pattern of globalization is shaping the global economic order into core zones, transitional zones and peripheral zones

By LUO ZHENXING | China Daily Global | Updated: 2025-07-30 07:54
Share
Share - WeChat
SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

The post-World War II international order, now entering its eighth decade, is deemed by Trumpists as misaligned with the interests of the United States while disproportionately benefiting strategic competitors such as China. Citing an unsustainable $1.2 trillion goods trade deficit as a pretext, the Donald Trump administration intensified its trade war on April 2 and branded it "Liberation Day", imposing "reciprocal tariffs" ranging from 13 to 49 percent on 57 countries while levying a 10 percent baseline tariff on all other economies.

The almost immediate consequence of this was the systematic dismantling of the international trade framework and the foundational economic order. By imposing so-called reciprocal tariffs — which violate the World Trade Organization's cardinal most-favored-nation principle — and unilateral 10 percent baseline tariffs that breach bound tariff commitments, the Trump administration has fundamentally undermined the architecture of global commerce. This has triggered a dual crisis: the global trading system now verges on collapse while the international economic order is descending into chaos. Critically, US efforts to construct replacements face extraordinary resistance due to three structural constraints.

First, the US lacks the capacity to unilaterally coerce global compliance with its envisioned order. Constructing viable international systems necessitates broad consensus and collaborative engagement — a requirement fundamentally incompatible with the Trump administration's bid for the strategic containment of China and coercive posture toward traditional allies. This self-sabotaging approach inevitably provokes systemic resistance.

Second, the Trump administration has perilously miscalculated the costs of restructuring global trade and the global economic architecture. Today's hyper-specialized production networks entail that rebuilding trading frameworks around supply chain resilience and security would incur staggering expenditures.

Third, a constitutive efficiency-security paradox emerges. The pursuit of economic sovereignty through national security-driven trade restructuring entrenches protectionism — systematically sabotaging rather than rebuilding the global trade system. Crucially, pushing manufacturing reshoring and defense-industrial expansion bleeds resources from the US' core comparative advantages in finance and technology toward its competitive deficiencies such as industrial production. This self-defeating misallocation corrodes US capabilities, jeopardizing its leadership in shaping the international economic order's evolution.

As the global trade war intensifies, the world economic order is destined to enter an extended period of turbulence. With hyper-globalization now discredited, and self-sufficiency or a return to near-total isolation impossible, the global trade system is increasingly likely to evolve into a staggered division pattern of globalization. Under this framework, economies may connect and diverge through four core threads — market scale, security, technology and values — which will function as the primary conduits for mutual attraction and cross-border connectivity between nations in the years ahead. The concept of blocs will then divide the world into three major spheres: core zones, transitional zones and peripheral zones.

The core zones will be North America (led by the US), the European Union (led by Germany) and East Asia (led by China).Peripheral zones include regions such as Latin America, Africa and parts of Eurasia. Transitional zones span Southeast Asia, South Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, and Central and Eastern Europe, among others. Each economy will connect with others through the four threads based on its geographical affiliation.

Against this backdrop, China should adopt several pivotal strategic approaches. First, China must champion free trade by steadfastly upholding the multilateral trading system, the UN-centered international framework, and the rules-based global order. Through resolute countermeasures against the US' trade attacks, China has established a critical precedent for economies resisting actions that subvert the global trading architecture. Concurrently, China should pursue independent, autonomous liberalization; modernize its existing free trade agreements through comprehensive upgrades; accelerate negotiations for the China-Japan-Republic of Korea FTA and comparable agreements; actively seek to advance accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership; expand Belt and Road cooperation; and initiate new FTA negotiations to systematically deepen global economic integration.

Second, China should continue its ongoing "tangled engagement "with the US. With the US maintaining an effective average tariff rate of approximately 52 percent on Chinese goods — a clear signal of its intent to pursue "comprehensive decoupling" — and explicitly or implicitly pressuring third countries to restrict the transshipments or re-exports of Chinese products to the US, both direct and indirect forms of engagement confront substantial practical obstacles. To reshape the Sino-US economic and trade relations, China should explore upgraded approaches, such as expanding greenfield investments and climate cooperation with the US.

Third, China should foster a trade system less reliant on the US. Given that the US accounts for less than 17 percent of global trade, more than 83 percent of global trade flows function independently of US markets. This reality carves out viable space for other nations to collaborate in building a more diversified trading system.

Fourth, China can work with other developing countries to advocate true multilateralism against US economic bullying, epitomized in the Trump administration's pattern of economic coercion toward various nations, which has triggered a widespread backlash.

The author is an associate research fellow at the Institute of American Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Contact the editor at editor@chinawatch.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 激情内射日本一区二区三区| 五月综合色婷婷影院在线观看| 97色婷婷成人综合在线观看| 日韩免费视频网站| 伊人久久无码中文字幕| 97人妻人人揉人人躁人人| 欧美成人看片黄a免费看| 国产无遮挡裸体免费视频 | 国产精品香蕉在线| 天天操狠狠操夜夜操| 久久久综合中文字幕久久| 欧美成人午夜免费完成| 免费高清a级毛片在线播放| 97色伦图片97综合影院| 推拿电影完整未删减版资源| 亚洲午夜国产片在线观看| 青青青视频免费| 国产系列在线播放| 中国china体内裑精亚洲日本| 波多野结衣456| 又硬又大又湿又紧a视频| 国产精品视频网站你懂得| 国内精品久久久久久99| 一级欧美一级日韩| 欧美天天综合色影久久精品| 国产乱码精品一区二区三区四川人 | 工囗番漫画全彩无遮拦老师| 五月天婷婷精品视频| 欧美波霸影院在线观看| 免费大黄网站在线看| 良妇露脸附生活照15| 国产成人无码AⅤ片在线观看| 3d动漫精品啪啪一区二区免费 | 皇上往下边塞玉器见客| 国产一区日韩二区欧美三区| bbbbbbbbb欧美bbb| 无码人妻一区二区三区av| 九九热爱视频精品| 欧美日韩一区二区在线视频| 体育生开房互操| 美女极度色诱视频国产|