Social mobility can help improve Gini ratio of our city

Updated: 2013-01-24 05:51

By Kui-Wai Li(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Income inequality is usually measured by the Gini ratio, a set of figures that focus on the percentage of a population receiving a certain percentage of the income of the total population. The nearer the resulting outcome is to 1.0, the greater the income inequality under the Gini ratio. Income is more equal when the Gini ratio is closer to zero.

In general, the average Gini for developed and developing countries is around 0.35 (0.45). Income inequality tends to be greater in poor countries because there are fewer opportunities for growth. The Gini ratio is not a perfect measurement. It gives just a snap shot and offers no dynamic picture of income growth, nor does it reflect improvements in social upward mobility.

It is quite impossible to achieve equality of income in modern economies, because education trains people and according to their training, they receive different incomes. In the case of Hong Kong, our post-World War II growth experience led to significant improvements in the Gini ratio, from near 0.45 in the 1960s and 1970s to around 0.35 in the 1980s when economic growth permitted greater social mobility and a corresponding reduction in poverty.

However, in the 1990s, overheating of the economy followed by the onset of the Asian financial crisis resulted in a prolonged period of economic recession in Hong Kong. Similar to other economic recessions, the fall in income would have meant a decline in the number of highly-paid jobs. The income pyramid would have changed, the acute angle at the apex would become flatter, the narrow base would be wider. In sum, there would be fewer "wealthy" people and more "needy" people. This necessarily means a rise in the Gini ratio and an increase in income inequality.

It is true that the Gini ratio in Hong Kong has deteriorated, probably now closing in on 0.5. However, one should try to understand the origin of this condition. The answer rests with the ability to raise income and the restoration of more high paid jobs, so that social mobility can lift people up to the income ladder and improve the Gini ratio. Although welfare advocates have mistakenly thought that a redistribution of income by taxing the rich and heavy government spending on the poor is the solution. Such a view is more of a political popularity than a practical solution.

In Hong Kong, the tested economic policy is the "supply driven" strategy that provides a solution from the "supply-end", where more investment is needed in order to create more jobs, employment and high pay for both skilled and unskilled workers, including the job opportunity for the immigrants.

The first Policy Address given by our new Chief Executive on January 16 specifically pointed out that Hong Kong cannot practice income redistribution through a high tax system. In many ways, it is poverty that is the more important concern than inequality. Equally, welfare advocates have taken a simple view of looking at the poverty issue from a static point of view by working on the stock, namely the quality of poor people in Hong Kong. This is a simple answer but not a solution.

Even if there is a "poverty line", the welfare supporters are simply calculating the number in the poverty pool. Their solution would simply involve in the amount of government spending and welfare support that would be given to the "poor".

The issue of poverty should be examined from a dynamic point of view, namely one has to consider the channel through which people fall into the poverty pool, and ways through which the poor can exit from the poverty pool. Typically, it would be most desirable to have policies that minimize the number of entrants and maximize the number of exits from the poverty pool. Over time, while there are new entrants of people with difficulty in securing jobs, appropriate "supply-led" policies will minimize the quantity in the poverty pool at any time.

Again "supply-led" policies include improvement in Hong Kong's competitiveness and attractiveness to investment, especially investment that creates jobs and expands the physical economy rather than portfolio investment that leads to speculations in stocks and properties. With increases in physical investment, jobs of different natures may be promoted, which will generate a positive multiplier effect on the economy creating additional employment opportunities in related fields.

Once there is a sufficient increase in physical investment and jobs, equality of opportunity should allow gradual improvement in upward mobility. It is only through such a strategy that the Gini ratio can be improved over time, not by massive amount of fiscal redistribution, though there should be sufficient assistance given to the needy in the fiscal framework.

The author is an associate professor of the Department of Economics and Finance at City University of Hong Kong.

(HK Edition 01/24/2013 page3)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人va亚洲电影| 成人综合激情另类小说| 你懂的国产精品| 视频二区中文字幕| 国产高清在线精品一区| 中文字幕乱码人妻一区二区三区 | 欧美色图第三页| 啊灬啊别停灬用力啊岳| 国产精品久久自在自线观看| 大香伊人久久精品一区二区| 午夜影视在线免费观看| 亚洲sss综合天堂久久久| 女人18毛片a级毛片免费视频| 久久国产综合精品欧美| 欧美日韩国产成人精品| 免费黄网站在线看| 香港国产特级一级毛片| 国产精品欧美亚洲韩国日本久久| 一级特黄特色的免费大片视频| 日韩视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩精品一区| 精品亚洲福利一区二区| 国产人妖系列在线精品| 亚洲欧美日韩国产一区图片 | 天堂√最新版中文在线| 中文字幕美日韩在线高清| 最美情侣中文字幕电影| 亚洲欧美日韩中文无线码| 积积对积积的桶120分钟| 国产精品美女久久久久AV福利| 一级毛片免费不卡| 日本后进式啦啦啦动态| 亚洲jizzjizz妇女| 欧美综合自拍亚洲综合图| 免费看岛国视频在线观看| 蜜桃麻豆www久久囤产精品| 国产白嫩美女在线观看| 97久久超碰国产精品2021| 妞干网在线免费观看| 亚洲www在线| 欧美肥妇毛多水多bbxx水蜜桃 |