Textbook pricing remains a hot topic

Updated: 2013-05-09 06:52

By Raymond So(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Textbook pricing remains a hot topic

Every year publishers of high school textbooks raise their prices, a chronic issue which has attracted much criticism. Parents have been complaining for years about the high prices. On average, an entire set of high school textbooks costs between HK$2,000 and HK$3,000. Worse still, the prices keep increasing, placing big burdens on many parents.

This year is no exception. Publishers recently announced there will be a 3.2 percent increase in textbook prices. With inflation now above 4 percent, this increase does not seem excessive. Nevertheless, many organizations and commentators have denounced the plan. Some accuse publishers of ignoring corporate social responsibility, while others say the publishers do not work hard enough to bring prices down.

Given the fact that everything is getting more expensive these days, the increase in textbook prices somehow is acceptable. In a free market, we cannot expect publishers to make a loss.

This protracted debate on textbook pricing also conveys much social sentiment, which makes it difficult to analyze objectively. There are occasions when publishers try to influence the schools' decisions on their choice of textbooks. In the past, publishers used to provide free-teaching materials to schools. Some publishers may even sponsor campus renovation projects. Furthermore, some publishers make editions of textbooks obsolete by making minor revisions.

Such "marketing" tools have created a negative image for publishers. Society has adopted the view that publishers are making excessive profits. This is more social sentiment than a fact, but, as mentioned above, the objection is strong this year even though the price increase seems reasonable.

One reason for this phenomenon is the market structure of high school textbooks. The high school market is limited. As the population of high school students shrinks, the size of the market is getting smaller. But, to develop a set of high school textbooks is expensive. There are many development costs publishers need to recover. With a smaller market, the average cost per book will be higher. To compound the problem, there are many changes to the curriculum and syllabi of subjects in high school education. To publishers, if a textbook needs to survive in this dynamic market condition, they will try to recover development costs as quickly as possible. Textbook prices will therefore not be low.

There is also a comprehensive and rigorous referee process in textbook production. Publishers cannot just produce a textbook at will. Publishers need to submit the textbooks to the government for formal approval, and this process can be lengthy and expensive. Of course, publishers will factor in these costs.

One often neglected point is that writers' fees are included in textbook prices as royalty payments. If the textbook is welcomed by the market, then the writer can obtain handsome royalty payments. The downside, however, is that royalty payment can constitute substantial amounts of a textbook's price. Very often royalty payments range from 10 percent to 20 percent. Together with a direct production cost of 30 percent, heavy portions of textbook prices are merely fixed in nature and cannot be further reduced. From this perspective, if society really hopes to see a reduction in textbook prices, the current system will disappoint them.

One way to change the system is to have official material provided by the government as textbook input. This way the costs of approval and textbook writing can be substantially reduced. Publishers can concentrate on the presentation and the pedagogical support. However, if the government is to provide official materials for textbooks, it is probable that a wave of strong debate will emerge. The government can easily produce "propaganda". Nevertheless, if nothing is done, the system will remain as is and complaints over textbook prices will occur every year.

The author is dean of the School of Business at Hang Seng Management College.

(HK Edition 05/09/2013 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人免费福利视频| 91福利视频网站| 精品无码一区二区三区在线| 尤物国产在线精品福利一区| 亚洲黄色免费网站| 韩国激情3小时三级在线观看| 成年福利片120秒体验区| 亚洲国产精品午夜电影| 香焦视频在线观看黄| 成**人特级毛片www免费| 亚洲一区日韩一区欧美一区a| 色综合久久久无码中文字幕波多| 好大好硬好爽免费视频| 亚洲成色www久久网站| 91手机在线视频观看| 成人性视频在线| 亚洲第一网站男人都懂| 黑白配hd视频| 成人欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲人成网男女大片在线播放| 色综合久久精品中文字幕首页 | 日日日天天射天天干视频| 免费观看性欧美一级| 91丨九色丨蝌蚪3p| 国产自产视频在线观看香蕉 | 男女啪啪免费体验区| 国产精品免费看久久久无码| 久久久国产成人精品| 精品久久久中文字幕二区| 国产精品综合一区二区三区| 久久国产乱子伦免费精品| 福利深夜小视频秒拍微拍| 国产精品久久久久一区二区三区| 久久婷婷人人澡人人喊人人爽| 欧美疯狂性受xxxxx另类| 国产午夜无码视频免费网站| 一二三四在线播放免费视频中国 | 日本在线视频www色| 亚洲人成在线播放网站岛国| 波多野结衣久久高清免费| 国产在线a不卡免费视频|