Dogfight over HK

Updated: 2013-09-20 15:33

By Wong Joon San and Li Tao(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

The upstart airline, Jetstar Hong Kong, is preparing for take-off, but the city's established airlines are making every effort to clip the wings of this new, low-cost entry into the air travel market. Wong Joon San and Li Tao examine the issues.

The established competition may have a tough fight keeping Jetstar Hong Kong out of the city's air-travel market. The fledgling airline has heavyweight backing and there's a dogfight brewing over control of the skies above Hong Kong.

Jetstar Hong Kong's chief backers are Australia-based Qantas Airways and Jetstar Australia. The other shareholders are Shanghai-based China Eastern and most recently, Shun Tak Holdings, the listed conglomerate founded by Macao gambling tycoon Stanley Ho Hung-sun.

Hong Kong's leading air carrier, Cathay Pacific and its subsidiary, Dragonair, have filed interventions, charging that Jetstar Hong Kong's principal base of operations will be Australia, where the fledgling carrier's prime backers are located. That would breach Article 134 of the Basic Law, which stipulates that Hong Kong must be the airline's principal base of operations.

Dogfight over HK

The complaint by Cathay and Dragonair, also noted that there is only limited capacity at Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA), and that what remains ought to be made available to benefit the interests of Hong Kong. Cathay Pacific and Dragonair doubted that Jetstar Hong Kong's business model, "will make the best use of the remaining available slots at HKIA," continuing, this is particularly important, "since the third runway at the airport, if approved, is not expected to be in operation before 2023," the statement said.

The argument by Cathay and Dragonair continued: "We are not against competition. We compete successfully in Hong Kong and elsewhere in the region each and every day, but we do not believe this is a matter of competition. This application raises important legal and public interest issues which could have very clear negative implications for the Hong Kong economy.

Dogfight over HK

"Granting a license to a foreign-controlled airline would set a very negative precedent that would undermine the health of aviation in Hong Kong. Approval of this application, therefore, would not be in the best interests of the Hong Kong economy and it would be contrary to the Basic Law," the two airlines asserted.

A week after Cathay Pacific issued its blistering attack on Jetstar, Hong Kong Airlines and its sister carrier, Hong Kong Express, acknowledged that they too have filed interventions with authorities opposing the budget airline's application to fly out of Hong Kong.

Unlike Cathay, Hong Kong Airlines and Hong Kong Express have not made public their reasons for opposing Jetstar. Their short public statement read simply, "we believe that the government will make the appropriate judgment based on the long-term development of the local aviation industry and the overall economic interests of Hong Kong."

At approximately the same time, last week, Hong Kong Express revealed details of its plans for low-cost air passenger services.

For Cathay Pacific, the timing of this challenge from a new budget airline that wants to compete for traffic on its home turf, is especially inconvenient. The airline already has a major problem finding customers to fill its premium seats. The cooling of China's economy has put a huge squeeze on Cathay's passenger traffic.

In August, Cathay Pacific announced that Ivan Chu, 51, will become its next chief executive. Chu will take over after the company's annual results are announced in March, 2014. Chu has been at Cathay for 29 years and took over as chief operating officer in March 2011. Whatever strategy he sets down will determine whether the airline retains its dominant 50 percent share of passenger traffic out of the former British colony.

Jetstar Hong Kong's entry into the local market is by no means assured. Local opposition is fierce. Even historical evidence argues against Jetstar's success. Oasis Hong Kong Airlines Ltd., which operated budget, long-haul flights, collapsed in 2008 after racking up losses of HK$1 billion in less than two years.

Jetstar Hong Kong

Jetstar Hong Kong's chairman, Pansy Ho Chiu-king, on Sept 11, rejected all charges against the airline. She said Hong Kong still has plenty of room for low-cost carriers. She maintained that a new budget airline would complement services rather than touch-off "vicious competition".

Speaking to the media for the first time since taking the helm in August, Ho, daughter of Stanley Ho, rejected the claim by Hong Kong-based airlines that the decision-making authority at Jetstar Hong Kong would reside outside the city.

She lashed out at the allegations advanced by Cathay and Dragonair that Jetstar Hong Kong's locally-based shareholders would have no say in management of the airline and that the city would not be the "principal place of business (as required) under the Basic Law."

Dogfight over HK

"Five out of the seven Jetstar board members (including myself) are Hong Kong people, who hold permanent resident Hong Kong identity cards," Ho said, pointing out that the two others include a mainland representative of China Eastern and another of Qantas. Our company is based in Hong Kong and our decision-making is in the city," she said. "(The majority of) our board members live in Hong Kong and they provide real service to Hong Kong."

She added her own jibe at the opposition, saying Jetstar Hong Kong is not like another airline with shareholders outside Hong Kong to which important decisions must be referred. It was an apparent reference to Cathay Pacific. Swire Pacific is Cathay Pacific's principal shareholder, with a 45 percent shareholding, while the other major shareholder is Air China (30 percent). Remaining shares are floated. Cathay Pacific is a publicly listed company on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The Ho family's listed flagship, Shun Tak Holdings, spent $66 million in June for a one-third share of Jetstar Hong Kong, which is now split three ways between itself, China Eastern Airlines and Qantas Airways.

Ms Ho also pointed out that since Jetstar Hong Kong had not yet started operations, its expenses were quite low.

Her statement allayed some concerns that Jetstar Hong Kong would face huge debts, putting it out of action even before it could obtain approval from aviation authorities.

Ms Ho substantiated her case that Hong Kong needs a budget airline, because Cathay's weekly promotion on discount fares, or "fanfares", is proof of the strong demand for discounted air tickets in the city.

Ho says: "It is inevitable that an incumbent service provider will defend its interest, which was what we (Shun Tak) did when Macao opened the gaming market for foreign players about 10 years ago. But we faced the reality of change, and changed our stance."

Contact the writer at joonsan@chinadailyhk.com

litao@chinadailyhk.com

Dogfight over HK

Dogfight over HK

(HK Edition 09/20/2013 page6)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 69精品久久久久| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜2020一 | 4399理论片午午伦夜理片| 成人黄软件网18免费下载成人黄18免费视频 | 四虎影视紧急入口地址大全| 福利视频导航大全| 女人十八黄毛片| 久久久久久亚洲精品不卡| 欧美在线一卡二卡一卡3卡4卡5| 免费高清在线爱做视频| 韩国伦理电影年轻的妈妈| 国产精品电影久久久久电影网| 一级毛片**免费看试看20分钟 | 无码人妻一区二区三区在线| 亚洲va中文字幕无码| 热99re久久精品香蕉| 噜噜噜综合亚洲| 黄+色+性+人免费| 国产精品无码素人福利不卡| www.日韩在线| 拨开内裤直接进入| 久久香蕉国产线看免费| 欧美日韩另类综合| 免费a在线观看| 美团外卖猛男男同38分钟| 国产区在线观看视频| 69xxxx视频| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 一区二区三区国产最好的精华液| 日本www在线播放| 久久青青草原亚洲AV无码麻豆| 欧美激情xxxx性bbbb| 伊人蕉久中文字幕无码专区 | 亚洲av无码一区二区三区不卡| 深夜a级毛片免费视频| 全部在线播放免费毛片| 色碰人色碰人视频| 国产孕妇孕交视频| 884hutv四虎永久黄网| 国产超碰人人模人人爽人人喊| hd日本扒衣党视频播放|