In the press

Updated: 2013-09-24 07:07

By Cho Wai(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

'Civil nomination' illegal

Civic Party leader Alan Leong Kah-kit, who is a big-shot lawyer by trade, said on a radio program the other day that he "cannot see" how the "civil nomination" format proposed by the Alliance for True Democracy and his party violates the Basic Law: "If you take a look at Article 45 of the Basic Law, it says very clearly that Chief Executive (CE) election candidates shall be nominated by a broadly representative nomination committee through a democratic process."

Leong's words are totally meant to mislead the public, because the Basic Law contains nothing about "civil nomination" and he was attempting to reduce the nomination committee to a rubber stamp. That is why it goes against the Basic Law and relevant decisions of the National People's Congress Standing Committee.

Zhang Xiaoming, director of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong SAR, pointed out in a written reply to Leong earlier this month that "civil nomination" totally ignores relevant provisions of the Basic Law, adding that "legal professionals should know better than others the importance of the rule of law and never cross the line." It appears Leong has abandoned the basic code of conduct of legal professionals in order to satisfy his own political needs.

Article 45 of the Basic Law stipulates that the ultimate goal of Hong Kong's democratic development is the election of the CE and members of the Legislative Council (LegCo) by universal suffrage; and CE election candidates will be nominated by "a broadly representative nomination committee", meaning it will be an institutional nomination process instead of an individual one.

"Civil nomination", on the other hand, relies on individual voters and anyone who has collected a certain number or more of voter signatures can stand for CE election. If "civil nomination" is adopted the term "broadly representative" will be irrelevant, as the nomination committee is redundant. In that case shouldn't the Basic Law be rewritten with "civil nomination" replacing references to the nomination committee?

The author is a current affairs commentator. This is an excerpted translation of his column published in Wen Wei Po on Sept 23.

In the press

(HK Edition 09/24/2013 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 绝美女神抬臀娇吟| 97色婷婷成人综合在线观看| 欧美bbbbxxxx| 免费成人在线网站| 久久精品国1国二国三在| 狠狠色综合网站久久久久久久高清 | 亚洲最大的黄色网| 女人16一毛片| 久久久www成人免费精品| 欧美一区二区在线观看免费网站| 免费a级毛片无码av| 色8久久人人97超碰香蕉987| 国产无遮挡又黄又爽免费网站| 99re在线播放视频| 开始疼痛的小小花蕾3| 伊人免费视频二| 色狠狠一区二区三区香蕉| 天堂岛在线免费看电影| 久久99精品福利久久久| 欧男同同性videos免费| 免费一级欧美大片视频在线 | 亚洲成a人一区二区三区| 香蕉久久ac一区二区三区| 国产高清一区二区三区视频 | 王雨纯脱得一点不剩| 四虎影视永久地址四虎影视永久地址www成人 | 国产精品二区在线| aaa毛片在线| 强奷乱码中文字幕| 久久久久久亚洲精品中文字幕| 最新国产你懂的在线网址| 公车上玩两个处全文阅读| 你懂的在线视频| 奇米四色7777| 中国xxx69视频| 日本欧美一级二级三级不卡| 无限资源日本免费2018| 国产人妖乱国产精品人妖| 4480新热播影院| 夫妇交换性三中文字幕| 中文乱码35页在线观看|