Housing Fund a sensible decision

Updated: 2015-01-05 06:18

By Raymond So(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Hong Kong has a serious housing problem. Solving it is now a major government priority. According to the government's recently announced Long-Term Housing Strategy, 290,000 public housing units, both public rental housing and home ownership scheme units, will be built. Although this 290,000 number is still believed by many to be insufficient, it has almost twice the amount currently being produced. On average, the current number of public housing units being built annually is around 15,000 units. This sharp increase in housing production obviously exerts considerable financial pressure on the Housing Authority (HA).

The HA' s cash and investment balance is, therefore, likely to fall significantly. The existing balance is over HK$60 billion, but estimates show it will decline to around HK$28 billion in four years. Simple arithmetic tells us that when more housing units are added to the list, the HA will have insufficient funds to meet its needs.

On different occasions, the HA has publicly discussed the financial difficulties it faces. In this year's budget speech, Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah asked the HA to estimate the financial gap which will result from the provision of further public housing. This is so the government can prepare for it. A long-term housing strategy cannot be accomplished without a strong financial commitment from the government. But how much money should it inject into the HA and when? The government already has to fund many public services. Although housing is a top priority, healthcare, education, social welfare are also important. The government should not be pressured to support public housing at the expense of other social services. The allocation of public resources clearly must be handled with great care.

Housing Fund a sensible decision

So the financial secretary was right when he said establishing a housing fund was timely and sensible. Of course, whatever the government does will always attract criticism. But people should not be too quick to criticize.

Estimating the fiscal gap faced by the Housing Authority is a difficult task. As the HA is a self-financing organization, Hong Kong cannot build endless public housing units because resources are limited. According to new housing construction indicators, a huge capital injection from the government may be necessary. This has also been suggested by the financial secretary's blog postings - the government is worried about having to commit over HK$100 billion. While this is a lot, but Hong Kong can still handle this because of its large financial reserves. Nevertheless, the housing problem is not a one-off issue. Another long-term housing strategy will be needed after the current one ends. If the HA cannot be self-financing in the long term, it may have to seek further funding from the government. Clearly this will be a considerable financial burden for the government.

Because of these considerations, the proposed housing fund is necessary. The idea behind it is simple: it intends to set aside more reserves during the good years so the HA has adequate financial resource when more are needed. The beauty of the fund is that it is specifically designated for public housing; financial resources for the fund will not be used in other areas. If there was not such a fund, future use of financial resources in public housing could not be guaranteed. It is possible that financial or political considerations might even prevent the government investing in public housing in future. Therefore, the establishment of the fund also demonstrates the long-term commitment of the government.

Another advantage of the fund is that money can be accumulated gradually. This will probably mean it will only have a minimal impact on the government's current public spending.

Of course, every government action is subject to criticism. Some people may think the fund will reduce the number of government "sweeteners" offered in future budgets. However, budgets should not always be about "sweeteners". Public finance should always aim to be an investment in the future.

The author is the dean of School of Business in Hang Seng Management College.

(HK Edition 01/05/2015 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 香蕉久久人人爽人人爽人人片av| 中文字幕一区视频| 狼人无码精华AV午夜精品| 国产成人一区二区在线不卡| AV无码免费一区二区三区| 日本人视频-jlzzjlzzjlzz| 亚洲欧美另类综合日韩| 美女扒开尿口给男人桶爽视频| 国产精品jizz在线观看直播| juy-432君岛美绪在线播放| 日本免费网站视频www区| 亚洲日本在线观看网址| 精品国产三级a∨在线| 国产后入又长又硬| 2o18国产大陆天天弄| 好大的奶女好爽视频| 久久久久久久99视频| 欧美一区二区日韩国产| 亚洲视频你懂的| 精品视频vs精品视频| 国产在线精品无码二区二区| 2022国产麻豆剧果冻传媒入口| 好妈妈5韩国电影高清中字| 久久91精品国产91久久麻豆| 李老汉的性生生活2| 亚洲经典在线观看| 一本色道久久HEZYO无码| 最近中文字幕在线中文视频| 亚洲精品tv久久久久久久久| 精品无码一区二区三区在线| 国产免费变态视频网址网站 | 国产做a爰片久久毛片a| 18禁男女爽爽爽午夜网站免费| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁中文字幕| 中文字幕免费视频精品一| 日韩一区二紧身裤| 亚洲av永久综合在线观看尤物| 欧美破苞合集magnet| 人妻在线日韩免费视频| 精品国产柚木在线观看| 国产一区二区小早川怜子|