English 中文網(wǎng) 漫畫網(wǎng) 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
中國網(wǎng)站品牌欄目(頻道)
當(dāng)前位置: Language Tips > Normal Speed News VOA常速

Donors set health priorities

[ 2012-09-28 15:12] 來源:中國日報網(wǎng)     字號 [] [] []  
免費訂閱30天China Daily雙語新聞手機報:移動用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009

Get Flash Player

Download

A new article in PLOS Medicine says large donors have a major influence on which health issues get funded. The author says it’s an attempt by governments and others to exert more control over international agencies.

Oxford University’s Dr. Devi Sridhar says large donors have shifted to a practice called multi-bi financing.

“Multi-bi financing is funds that at first glance look multilateral. They’re given to multilateral agencies. You know, the WHO, the World Bank or new initiatives that look multilateral at the surface, but that actually have more characteristics that are bilateral in that they’re often earmarked. They’re often limited in duration. It’s this new area and it’s been growing. It’s been estimated to account for 40 percent of total multilateral funding,” she said.

Agencies like the World Health Organization are relying more on this type of funding, rather than on a standard annual budget. In fact, Sridhar said almost 80 percent of the WHO’s budget comes from voluntary contributions, which would be classified as multi-bi financing.

“Within the World Health Organization, there have been concerns raised, particularly by developing countries and emerging countries such as Brazil, over how much influence voluntary contributions are having, rather than the assessed budget – what countries are required to pay each year through kind of a U.N. formula,” she said.

Sridhar is a university lecturer in Global Health Politics and co-director of the Center for AIDS Interdisciplinary Research. She said the major donors are the U., Britain, Japan, the European Commission and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

“Well, what you get is actually priorities being skewed in a way that perhaps fits the priorities of the donor in question - whether it’s taxpayers - whether it’s the priorities of a particular organization. And it differs from how priorities are set within, let’s say, a body like the World Health Organization, where you have all member states come together in the World Health Assembly to decide collaboratively through deliberation what the priorities should be for the organization. So, in a way, it’s priorities being decided by the few for the many,” she said.

She said it’s also generating debate on how funds should be spent within the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Since the global financial crisis, donors are demanding that projects not only improve health, but be cost-effective, as well.

“So you are seeing much more reliance in actually trying to monitor these international agencies more closely - being able to decide the priorities, to realign them with those of a particular donor," said Sridhar.

Sridhar said one of the main issues is that short-term health concerns might take priority over long term objectives.

“Part of the rationale for creating the World Health Organization was that countries would compromise their short term differences in order to obtain the long term benefits of collaboration," she said. "For example, international health regulations, which require countries to report on, let’s say, disease outbreaks in their country. It’s not necessarily in the short term interest of a country to do that, but it’s in the long term collective interest of the global community for this to happen.”

She said when large donors set health priorities, input from technocrats – such as public health experts, economists and lawyers – may not be included in discussions. Also, many of the new initiatives are funded by the private sector, such as pharmaceutical companies. The question arises as to how much influence the private sector should wield.

“How actually do we include these powerful stakeholders, but in a way that controls conflict of interest? And make sure that actually public health is the primary concern – not opening new markets or profit motives,” she said.

But Sridhar did say that multi-bi financing “has shown a light on how and where multilateral institutions might do better” and bring about reforms.

相關(guān)閱讀

Internet, social media prominent in US presidential race

Libya's minority Berbers renew equality demands

Researchers say racist Internet sites breed Hate

Romney announces Ryan as VP running mate

(來源:VOA 編輯:Julie)

 
中國日報網(wǎng)英語點津版權(quán)說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網(wǎng)英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創(chuàng)作品,除與中國日報網(wǎng)簽署英語點津內(nèi)容授權(quán)協(xié)議的網(wǎng)站外,其他任何網(wǎng)站或單位未經(jīng)允許不得非法盜鏈、轉(zhuǎn)載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯(lián)系;凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉(zhuǎn)載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉(zhuǎn)載,請與稿件來源方聯(lián)系,如產(chǎn)生任何問題與本網(wǎng)無關(guān);本網(wǎng)所發(fā)布的歌曲、電影片段,版權(quán)歸原作者所有,僅供學(xué)習(xí)與研究,如果侵權(quán),請?zhí)峁┌鏅?quán)證明,以便盡快刪除。
 

關(guān)注和訂閱

人氣排行

翻譯服務(wù)

中國日報網(wǎng)翻譯工作室

我們提供:媒體、文化、財經(jīng)法律等專業(yè)領(lǐng)域的中英互譯服務(wù)
電話:010-84883468
郵件:translate@chinadaily.com.cn
 
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产无遮挡又黄又爽又色| 中文字幕第12页| jizzjlzzjlzz性欧美| 波多野结衣中文字幕在线视频| 嫩草影院免费观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产又污又爽又色的网站| 成年女人色毛片| 亚洲色图15p| 永久在线观看www免费视频| 日韩一区二区视频| 免费国产a国产片高清| 无遮挡1000部拍拍拍免费凤凰 | 久久se精品动漫一区二区三区| 精品国产午夜理论片不卡| 国外AV无码精品国产精品| 九九全国免费视频| 色偷偷人人澡人人爽人人模| 天天综合色天天综合网| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码va| 老师的胸又大又软真好吃| 天堂а在线中文在线新版| 五月丁六月停停| 波多野结衣女教师6bd| 国产在线精品一区二区在线看| 一本色综合网久久| 欧美大BBBBBBBBBBBB| 国产一区二区三区精品视频| a级日本片在线观看| 欧美αv日韩αv另类综合| 啦啦啦www免费视频| 2021最新热播欧美极品| 无码精品久久久久久人妻中字| 什么网站可以看毛片| 黄色免费一级片| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁一区| 亚洲va韩国va欧美va天堂| 精品国产一区二区三区久久影院| 国产在线激情视频| 北岛玲日韩精品一区二区三区| 性高湖久久久久久久久aaaaa |