We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Reports

Measurement of Relative Poverty in the Post-2020 Period: International Experience and Policy Options (No.143, 2020)

2020-07-30

By Li Ying & Li Fan, Research Team on “Social Justice and Relevant Issues at Relative Poverty Stage”, China Development Research Foundation

Research Report, No.143, 2020 (Total 5887) 2020-6-15

Abstract: Relative poverty will become the major issue for poverty alleviation work in the post-2020 period and accordingly we need to define a threshold for evaluating relative poverty. This paper notes that differentiated relative poverty thresholds need to be made respectively in urban and rural areas. 40% of the median disposable income of urban residents could be used as urban relative poverty threshold and 50% of median disposable income of rural residents as rural relative poverty threshold. Since China entered the brackets of middle income countries in the world, the relative poverty rate across the country has maintained relatively stable; the overall poverty rate in 2018 was 12.6% with urban rate standing at 6.0% and rural areas at 22.3% respectively; the aggregate poverty population is about 176 million with 49.81 million in urban areas and 126 million in rural areas. On comparable basis, China’s relative poverty rate is generally higher than those high-income OECD member countries whereas the figure equals to those of mid-to-high-income countries, which is roughly in line with features of economic development at present stage. During the phase of relative poverty period, China is faced with a dual challenge imposed by a huge scale of rural population in poverty and an increasing number of poor people in urban areas. We need to make adjustments toward the targeted group of people and the goal and measures in poverty alleviation effort. In the meantime, we need to promote the integrated development of rural and urban areas and strive to narrow the gap between rural and urban areas.

Keywords: relative poverty, threshold, poverty scale, international comparison

 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品视频一区二区三区在线观看| 99精品全国免费观看视频| 欧美性高清极品猛交| 可以看的毛片网站| 四虎成年永久免费网站| 天天天天天天天操| 国产一级黄色电影| 中国又粗又大又爽的毛片| 精品国产AV无码一区二区三区| 在线成年人网站| 久久99精品九九九久久婷婷| 精品一区二区三区视频| 国产成人无码午夜视频在线观看| 中文天堂在线观看| 果冻传媒mv在线| 亚洲视频日韩视频| 耻辱にまみれた失禁调教 | 67194国产精品免费观看| 成人午夜免费福利视频| 亚洲欧美日韩久久精品第一区| 美女被暴羞羞免费视频| 国产欧美日韩亚洲一区二区三区 | 91精品久久久久久久久中文字幕 | 天堂√在线中文最新版8| 亚洲va在线va天堂va不卡下载| 老司机精品视频在线| 国产毛片在线看| 99re热视频| 日本高清不卡码| 亚洲婷婷综合色高清在线| 色综合久久天天综合观看| 国产精品99久久久精品无码| 99爱在线视频| 很黄很色的女同性互慰小说| 久久激情综合网| 欧美与黑人午夜性猛交久久久 | 国产va在线观看| 黄色aaa毛片| 国产精品亚洲精品爽爽| 三级韩国一区久久二区综合| 欧美人与动zozo欧美人z0|