Aging Digital Artworks Are difficult to restore

Updated: 2013-06-30 07:37

By Melena Ryzik(The New York Times)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

 Aging Digital Artworks Are difficult to restore

New technologies threaten digital art. An image from "The World's First Collaborative Sentence," by Douglas Davis. Lehman College Art Gallery

Aging Digital Artworks Are difficult to restore

Paintings fade; sculptures chip. Art restorers have long known how to repair those material flaws. But when a Web-based work becomes technologically obsolete, does updated software simply restore it? Or is the piece fundamentally changed?

That was the conundrum facing the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York, which in 1995 became one of the first institutions to acquire an Internet-made artwork. Created by the artist Douglas Davis, "The World's First Collaborative Sentence" functioned as blog comments do, allowing users to add to its opening lines. The piece attracted 200,000 contributions worldwide from 1994 to 2000.

By 2005 it had changed computer servers, and the programmer moved on. But when Whitney curators decided to resurrect the piece last year, the art didn't work. Once innovative, "The World's First Collaborative Sentence" now mostly just crashed browsers with its rudimentary code and out-of-date links.

In trying to restore the Davis work, which was finally achieved at the end of May, the Whitney encountered a challenge unique to digital art: its 1s and 0s degrade far more rapidly than traditional visual art does, and the demands of upkeep are much higher.

"We're working on constantly shifting grounds," said Rudolf Frieling, a curator of media arts at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, which has been at the forefront of sustaining online art. "Whatever hardware, platform or device we're using is not going to be there tomorrow."

At the Whitney, a team of programmers and curators spent more than a year debating and tinkering with the restoration. Mr. Davis, now 80, could not consult on rebuilding his piece.

"One of the biggest philosophical questions," said Christiane Paul, adjunct curator of new media at the museum, "was, do we leave these links broken, as a testament to the Web" and its rapid development?

"Collaborative Sentence" is still valuable, Ms. Paul said, especially as a harbinger of the future. By allowing interaction across cultures and countries, "it anticipated so much of what happened in Web 2.0," she said.

Many artists, curators and patrons are now reconsidering whether such art should remain unchanged, said Pip Laurenson, the head of collection care research at the Tate Gallery in London. "It's no longer the model that a museum acquires something into its collection and tries to fix it into the time it was acquired or when it left the artist's studio."

After much deliberation, the curators decided on a nearly unheard-of solution: to duplicate Mr. Davis's installation and present it in both original and updated forms.

One version is the frozen original, with broken code and instructions for users who wanted to fax in their contributions.

"The idea is that it's sort of a time capsule," said Ben Fino-Radin, a digital archivist who helped rebuild the work.

The new version, which the Whitney calls the live version, looks similar but has some new links. Users can't contribute to the historical site, but they can add to the live one - albeit not by fax. The Whitney also open-sourced part of the original, hoping that users would contribute to its upkeep.

In 1995 Mr. Davis's piece was shown in a biennial in South Korea attended by the celebrated video artist Nam June Paik. It has hundreds of comments in Korean, but the code for the characters was so degraded that Mr. Fino-Radin was stumped. If other viewers fix it, he said, seeing those messages "will be a first for Western audiences."

Over the past decade, experts at the New Art Trust, the Tate Modern in London and the Museums of Modern Art in New York and San Francisco started Matters in Media Art, a consortium dedicated to studying the issue of digital art becoming obsolete.

"For institutions that early on committed to Net art, a lot of that work is now vanishing," Ms. Paul said.

And the proliferation of online culture and whatever the next tech revolution brings will make preserving those visionary moments "more challenging," she said. "Not less."

The New York Times

(China Daily 06/30/2013 page12)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 99久久久精品免费观看国产| 久草资源福利站| 色一情一乱一伦一视频免费看| 国模欢欢炮交150视频| 中文字幕综合网| 欧美XXXX做受欧美1314| 天天操天天摸天天爽| 久久精品国产99久久久古代| 深夜特黄a级毛片免费播放| 国产三级精品三级在专区中文| 18禁男女爽爽爽午夜网站免费| 少妇愉情理伦片高潮日本| 久久精品天天中文字幕人妻| 深夜影院一级毛片| 啊灬啊别停灬用力视频啊视频| 精品国产一二三区在线影院| 在线视频一区二区三区| 中文字幕欧美在线观看| 最近中文字幕免费mv视频7| 亚洲精品无码久久久久秋霞| 美女大量吞精在线观看456| 国产成人在线免费观看| 99re6在线| 小仙女app2021版最新| 久久久国产精品无码免费专区 | 久久亚洲AV无码精品色午夜麻豆| 欧美成人手机视频| 免费a级毛片无码鲁大师| 老司机精品在线| 国产喷水女王在线播放| 波多野结衣导航| 国内精品久久久久久99蜜桃 | 国产午夜无码视频在线观看| 18一20岁一级毛片| 在线看片中文字幕| 一女多男在疯狂伦交在线观看| 日本xxxx色视频在线播放| 九月婷婷人人澡人人添人人爽| 欧美日韩一区二区三区在线观看视频| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 精品国产日韩亚洲一区二区|