Fate of a musical in the crowd's hands

Updated: 2013-07-07 08:34

By Patrick Healy(The New York Times)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

 Fate of a musical in the crowd's hands

Dial testing, common in politics, television and music, has now arrived in the theater. In Portland, Oregon, audience members register their opinions. Leah Nash for The New York Times

Fate of a musical in the crowd's hands

PORTLAND, Oregon - Seven minutes into his new musical, "Somewhere in Time," the Broadway producer Ken Davenport leapt off his stool and began pointing. Not at the stage, but at a nearby laptop that showed - in a fever-chart line - the reactions of 60 audience members as they turned hand-held dials among three choices: "Love this part," "Neutral about this part" and "Hate this part."

The dials seemed to pinpoint a problem with the song "Tick Tick Tick": the fever line slid as the main character, Richard, lamenting the rush of life, was interrupted by dry dialogue from his brother.

"The dials matched my instincts," Mr. Davenport said during intermission at Portland Center Stage here, where he was trying this system for the first time for the musical's world premiere. "By the time we get the show to New York, I bet we'll drop that dialogue."

Thus dial testing, common in politics, television and movies, has now arrived in the theater. The very idea of it is raising questions in the industry about what makes good theater.

"Did Beethoven ask, 'Was the second movement too dull?' This is scary. Do we want to test-market Broadway until it becomes a theme park?" said Emanuel Azenberg, a producer for 45 years.

Focus groups and audience surveys are increasingly part of theater already, to the distress of some producers like Mr. Azenberg, who see them as crutches that lead to simplistic shows. Several producers said dials were the enemy of groundbreaking work.

Others, like Sue Frost, who used focus groups on her show "Memphis" - which won the best musical Tony in 2010 - were intrigued but skeptical that dials would catch on among Broadway producers because the technology might make audiences "so hypercritical that you get more data and opinions than are useful."

"I also believe that I can tell a lot by standing in the back every night and listening to the audience," she added. "You know when they're bored, when a song is going too long."

This old-school approach - relying on eyes and ears - evokes the era of auteur-producers like David Merrick and Harold Prince, who began new musicals out of town and compiled fix-it lists based on their aesthetic sensibilities, the body language of audiences and feedback from friends and critics. The reality of Broadway today is that 75 percent of shows lose money.

"Why not use dials and every other tool possible to create more musicals that please audiences and turn a profit?" said Damian Bazadona of Situation Interactive, a marketing company that works on Broadway shows.

Frank Luntz, a Republican consultant who pioneered dial-testing in political messaging and also has done dial-testing for TV shows, said the feedback did not guarantee success "but oftentimes can prevent failure."

"I'm a little surprised Broadway is doing this, to be honest," he added. "Producers have a vision in their head, and they don't want the masses affecting or impacting that vision."

Mr. Davenport said the dials were guidance, not a veto, for his judgment about "Somewhere in Time," based on a 1980 film about a playwright who travels back through the years to pursue a romance with an actress. The movie, which starred Christopher Reeve, had bad reviews but earned fans, particularly among women - leading Mr. Davenport to view "Somewhere in Time" as a pretested brand that might appeal on Broadway, since two-thirds of audiences there are female.

Over three performances of dial-testing, no single song bombed, but parts of songs and scenes caused consistent dips in the fever line. One musical number that received the show's highest dial score - 80 out of a possible 100 - was "A Trip to the Grand," which delivered ballroom choreography and lavish period costumes, the sort of big production number that musical traditionalists love.

"This Portland production cost $1 million, and our Broadway production will cost $10 million, but that score of 80 tells me that maybe ours should cost $11 million," Mr. Davenport said. "Maybe another $1 million could get us to 90 in that number."

The New York Times

(China Daily 07/07/2013 page12)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 九月婷婷人人澡人人添人人爽| 国产精品天堂avav在线| 亚洲Aⅴ在线无码播放毛片一线天| 精品国产三级a∨在线观看| 国产无遮挡吃胸膜奶免费看| chinese体育男白袜videogay| 日本中文字幕电影| 亚洲剧场午夜在线观看| 男女做污污无遮挡激烈免费| 国产乱码精品一区二区三区四川| 先锋影音男人资源| 天天射综合网站| 四虎网站1515hh四虎| 一本色道久久88综合日韩精品| 欧美AAAAAA级午夜福利视频| 免费啪啪社区免费啪啪手机版| 青草午夜精品视频在线观看 | 国产成人亚洲综合一区| 中文字幕の友人北条麻妃| 欧美一级在线免费观看| 偷看农村妇女牲交| 色婷婷亚洲十月十月色天| 国产清纯白嫩初高生在线观看| av在线亚洲男人的天堂| 手机在线观看精品国产片| 亚欧洲精品在线视频免费观看| 正在播放国产美人| 免费高清在线观看| 色黄网站成年女人色毛片| 国产欧美精品区一区二区三区| 99热在线免费播放| 尤物网在线视频| 久久久久久久久久久久福利| 李老汉的性生生活2| 亚洲狼人综合网| 精品一区二区三区在线观看l | 国产va免费精品高清在线| 国色天香网在线| 国产精品拍拍拍| 99热这里只有精品6免费| 快拨出来老师要怀孕了|