您現在的位置: Language Tips> Audio & Video> Speech  
 





 
Bush's speech about war spending bill
[ 2007-03-19 14:14 ]

(March 10 ,2007)

Good morning. In times of war, Congress has no greater obligation than funding our war fighters. And next week, the House will begin debate on an emergency war spending bill.

The purpose of this legislation should be to give our troops on the front lines the resources, funds, and equipment they need to fight our enemies. Unfortunately, some in Congress are using this bill as an opportunity to micromanage our military commanders, force a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, and spend billions on domestic projects that have nothing to do with the war on terror.

Our troops urgently need Congress to approve emergency war funds. Over the past several weeks, our Nation has begun pursuing a new strategy in Iraq. Under the leadership of General David Petraeus, our troops have launched a difficult and dangerous mission to help Iraqis secure their capital. This plan is still in its early stages, yet we're already seeing signs of progress. Iraqi and American troops have rounded up more than 700 people affiliated with Shia extremists. They've also launched aggressive operations against Sunni extremists. And they've uncovered large caches of weapons that could have been used to kill our troops. These are hopeful signs. As these operations unfold, they will help the Iraqi government stabilize the country, rebuild the economy, and advance the work of political reconciliation. Yet the bill Congress is considering would undermine General Petraeus and the troops under his command just as these critical security operations are getting under way.

First, the bill would impose arbitrary and restrictive conditions on the use of war funds and require the withdrawal of forces by the end of this year if these conditions are not met. These restrictions would handcuff our generals in the field by denying them the flexibility they need to adjust their operations to the changing situation on the ground. And these restrictions would substitute the mandates of Congress for the considered judgment of our military commanders.

Even if every condition required by this bill was met, all American forces -- except for very limited purposes -- would still be required to withdraw next year, regardless of the situation in Iraq. The consequences of imposing such an artificial timetable would be disastrous.

Here is what Secretary of Defense Robert Gates recently told Congress: Setting a fixed date to withdraw would "essentially tell [the enemy] how long they would have to wait until we're gone." If American forces were to step back from Baghdad before it is more secure, the scale and scope of attacks would increase and intensify. A contagion of violence could spill out across the entire country, and in time, this violence would engulf the region. The enemy would emerge from the chaos emboldened with new safe havens, new recruits, new resources, and an even greater determination to harm America. Such an outcome would be a nightmare for our country.

Second, the bill would cut funding for the Iraqi security forces if Iraqi leaders did not meet rigid conditions set by Congress. This makes no sense. Members of Congress have often said that the Iraqis must step forward and take more responsibility for their own security -- and I agree. Yet Members of Congress can't have it both ways: They can't say that the Iraqis must do more and then take away the funds that will help them do so. Iraq is a young democracy that is fighting for its survival in a region that is vital to American security. To cut off support for their security forces at this critical moment would put our own security at risk.

Third, the bill would add billions of dollars in domestic spending that is completely unrelated to the war. For example, the House bill would provide $74 million for peanut storage, $48 million for the Farm Service Agency, and $35 million for NASA. These programs do not belong in an emergency war spending bill. Congress must not allow debate on domestic spending to delay funds for our troops on the front lines. And Members should not use funding our troops as leverage to pass special interest spending for their districts.

We are a Nation at war, and the heaviest responsibilities fall to our troops in the field. Yet we in Washington have responsibilities, as well. General Petraeus was confirmed by the Senate without a single vote in opposition, and he and his troops need these resources to succeed in their mission. Many in Congress say they support the troops, and I believe them. Now they have a chance to show that support in deed, as well as in word. Congress needs to approve emergency funding for our troops, without strings and without delay. If they send me a bill that does otherwise, I will veto it.

Thank you for listening.


點擊進入更多名人演講

(來源:http://www.weeklyradioaddress.com/  英語點津姍姍編輯)

 
 
相關文章 Related Stories
 
         
 
 
 
 
 
         

 

 

 
 

48小時內最熱門

     
  “出入境手續”怎么說?
  炒股應該跟著感覺走嗎?
  學會說“不”
  The Da Vinci Code《達?芬奇密碼》(精講之三)
  “帥呆了”怎么說

本頻道最新推薦

     
  女孩的心思誰能猜:Suspended from class
  《說點什么吧》:Say something anyway
  Mountain and cowboy culture meet in Jackson Hole
  Livestock disease spreads in Britain
  Working magic in the garden with beans

論壇熱貼

     
  CDCLUB(BJ)+非凡英語沙龍(e-Salon)秋日朝陽公園英語交游盛會
  “黃土高坡”怎么說
  “穿幫”怎么說
  “托養協議”,指老人托養
  As If!(e-c)practice
  “試婚”怎么說






主站蜘蛛池模板: 窝窝午夜看片国产精品人体宴| 久久精品日日躁精品| 麻豆一卡2卡三卡4卡网站在线| 无翼乌r18无遮掩全彩肉本子| 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码三区| 色婷婷久久综合中文网站| 小兔子被蛇用两根是什么小说| 五月天婷婷伊人| 污网站在线免费看| 君子温如玉po| 黄色片一级毛片| 国产精品线在线精品国语| 久久国产精品免费一区二区三区 | 免费看黄色软件大全| 97无码人妻福利免费公开在线视频| 欧美成人免费在线视频| 别揉我胸啊嗯奶喷了动态图| 888米奇在线视频四色| 很污很黄的网站| 久久午夜夜伦鲁鲁片无码免费| 欧美国产日韩久久久| 俄罗斯大荫蒂女人毛茸茸| 色吊丝永久在线观看最新免费| 国产欧美日韩中文久久| 东京热TOKYO综合久久精品| 最近更新中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品一区二区三区四区乱码| 精品国产日韩久久亚洲| 国产乱妇无码大黄aa片| 好吊色青青青国产在线观看| 少妇人妻在线视频| 久久久久人妻一区精品性色av| 欧美一区二区影院| 亚洲精品第一国产综合野| 丁香六月色婷婷| 国产精品美女久久久久AV福利| www.99精品| 成人亚洲欧美激情在线电影| 亚洲国产精品综合久久20| 男女久久久国产一区二区三区| 四虎影视在线影院4hutv|